Adds the system payment method for paying with EnakPoint
(docs/prd-point-coin.md F9, §8, §10.5, PC-303).
Migration 000094 allows the point type, keeps one per organization with a
partial unique index, creates it for every existing organization, and adds
a trigger that creates it for new ones, as the walk-in customer is. It adds
payments.points_used and point_value. Their CHECK is written so it can
never be NULL: the PRD form, (both NULL) OR (both > 0), is NULL for
points_used with a NULL point_value, which a CHECK lets through, so a
payment could have lost the value a refund depends on. A test caught it.
The API cannot create, delete or retype the EnakPoint method, nor turn
another method into one; that answers 400. Renaming it is allowed. The
method list takes the outlet from ?outlet_id= or the user's outlet and
leaves EnakPoint out when that outlet does not accept it, filtered in the
query so the count stays right. The organization-wide active list is
unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds GET and PUT /marketing/loyalty-settings and GET
/marketing/loyalty-settings/history (docs/prd-point-coin.md F2, PC-302).
The settings are the point value, the exchange rate, transfer limits and
the stored expiry settings. PUT merges the body like the outlet settings
and is limited to loyalty managers. Every response carries the impact of
the change on the balances in circulation: outstanding EnakPoint and
EnakCoin, their rupiah value, and the coins exchanged into points, before
and after. With ?dry_run=true nothing is saved and the response lists the
keys that would change, for the warning shown before saving.
Saving records each change in loyalty_setting_changes with who made it;
history can be filtered to one outlet. Changing the value leaves what was
already written alone. The diff behind saving and previewing is shared.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the 6-digit customer PIN that approves every action moving EnakPoint
or EnakCoin on the customer's request (docs/prd-point-coin.md K8, F11, Q16,
Q17, PC-301).
Migration 000093 adds the PIN columns to customers and the
customer_security_events table. PIN data is read and written only through
CustomerPinRepository, never the Customer entity, so the hash cannot reach
a customer response. Only a bcrypt hash is stored.
- /customer/pin: status, OTP (pin_setup, pin_reset), create, change,
reset. The OTP must be for that purpose and sent to the customer's own
number; the existing OTP validation checks neither. A new PIN is checked
(6 digits, confirmed, not one digit, not a run up or down, not the birth
date as DDMMYY or YYMMDD) before the OTP is spent.
- Five wrong attempts in a row lock the PIN for 30 minutes; the counter is
incremented in one statement so attempts at the same time all count,
and a lock that ran out starts a new series. A locked PIN is refused even
when right. The customer is told by WhatsApp, as there is no push channel
to customers yet; only the attempt that reached the limit alerts.
- A reset through OTP lifts the lock and holds outgoing transfers for 24
hours; paying and exchanging still work, and a held transfer costs no
attempt.
- VerifyPin(ctx, customer, pin, action) for the flows that follow, with
PIN_NOT_SET, PIN_INVALID (attempts left), PIN_LOCKED and
TRANSFER_BLOCKED (until when), which PinErrorResponse turns into
distinct codes and statuses.
- DELETE /marketing/customers/:id/pin (loyalty managers, reason required)
and GET /marketing/customers/:id/security-events, scoped to the
organization.
Every PIN event is in the security log with IP and user agent. No message
or binding error contains a PIN.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds GET and PUT /outlets/:id/loyalty-settings (docs/prd-point-coin.md F1,
PC-201) on top of the typed settings processor.
The response shows every setting with its default when unset, the
organization's point value, and the effective EnakPoint cashback
(earn_value × point_value / earn_per_amount), so an owner cannot misread
the scale. PUT applies the body on top of the current settings: fields left
out keep their value, null clears an optional limit, and unknown fields are
refused so a typo cannot be ignored silently. The read-only fields of the
GET response are accepted and ignored, so a client can send back what it
received. It returns the keys that changed. Values outside the F1 bounds
answer 400, and an outlet of another organization 404.
RequireAdminOrManager also lets the purchasing role through, so loyalty
settings and the manual wallet adjustment from PC-107 now use a stricter
RequireLoyaltyManager (superadmin, admin, manager, owner).
Adds a test that registers every route, since gin panics at startup when
two routes name the same path parameter differently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds LoyaltySettingsProcessor (docs/prd-point-coin.md F1, F2, F12, PC-109).
Reading returns typed settings for an outlet (earning per currency, paying
with EnakPoint) and for an organization (point value, exchange rate,
transfers, and the expiry settings awaiting note N4). A key that was never
set takes the PRD default. A stored value that is unusable, such as an
earn_per_amount of 0 that would divide by zero, also falls back to the
default and is logged, so a bad row never reaches a calculation.
Writing takes the whole settings struct, validates every rule in the PRD
before touching the database, and stores and records in
loyalty_setting_changes only the keys whose effective value changes: old
value (NULL while it was on its default), new value, and who changed it.
Clearing a limit deletes the stored value. Each save runs in one
transaction under an advisory lock per outlet or organization, so two saves
at once cannot both compute their change from the same old value. The
outlet must belong to the caller's organization.
Every key is described once (key, default, valid range, bound field), and
reading, validating and diffing all use that description.
GET /customer/wallet now reads the point value through this processor; the
minimal organization settings repository from PC-106 is removed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the dashboard side of a customer's wallet (docs/prd-point-coin.md F7,
PC-107), under /marketing for admins and managers:
- GET /marketing/customers/:id/wallet returns the customer, the ledger and
spendable balances, every lot that still holds something (flagged when
expired), and a page of history. Unlike the customer's own view, each row
carries the real names behind it: the transfer counterparty, the admin or
cashier, and the outlet, plus the reason and metadata.
- POST /marketing/customers/:id/wallet/adjust takes a signed amount and a
required reason. It writes an ADJUSTMENT pointing at the admin through the
wallet engine, refuses to take more than the customer can spend, and
accepts an optional idempotency key so a retried request adjusts once.
Reasons describing a cash-out are refused (K7).
The customer must belong to the caller's organization; otherwise both
endpoints answer 404. Positive adjustments create non-expiring lots until
the expiry model is decided (F12, note N4).
The mapping from ledger rows to what the apps show is now shared between the
customer and dashboard views.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GET /customer/wallet now reads the EnakPoint & EnakCoin wallet
(docs/prd-point-coin.md F6, PC-106): spendable point and coin balances, the
rupiah value of one EnakPoint and of the balance, the nearest day each
currency loses balance (grouped by Asia/Jakarta day), and recent ledger
rows. The fields of the pre-wallet response stay, filled from the wallet, so
app versions that read them keep working.
Adds GET /customer/wallet/transactions with pagination and filters for
currency, one or more types, and an inclusive date range. Each row shows
where the value came from (additions) or went to (deductions) as in §8.1,
and additions list their lots and earliest expiry. The counterparty id, the
admin and the metadata are left out; the description already carries the
masked name. A malformed query answers 400, a missing customer 404.
/customer/points and /customer/tokens keep their shape and now read the
wallet too, so customer_points_repository is no longer used for balances.
Balances are what the customer can spend: lots that have expired but that
the expiry job has not processed are not counted. The point value is read
from organization_settings (loyalty.point.value, default 1) through a small
repository that the typed settings reader in PC-109 will build on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Products like fish are sold per weighing (4.2 ons, 5.6 ons), which the
order line could not represent: quantity is INTEGER and prices are always
computed as quantity * unit_price.
Model one weighing as one order line. quantity stays INTEGER and keeps
meaning "how many items"; the measured amount goes into a new nullable
order_items.weight, and the line is priced weight * unit_price. Two
weighings of the same product are two lines, never merged into one.
Keeping quantity integral avoids float comparisons in void, refund and
split bill, where accumulated rounding error would silently misbehave —
"1.4 + 1.4 + 1.4" is not 4.2 in float64, which would leave a fully paid
split-bill item marked unpaid.
BillableQuantity() is now the single place that decides between weight
and count; every price and cost calculation goes through it. Missing one
would bill a 4.2 ons fish as a single ons — wrong money, no error.
Two database constraints back the design: a weighed line always carries a
positive weight, and its quantity is pinned to 1. The latter also makes
void all-or-nothing for weighed lines, so the row-splitting branch can
never produce a zero-weight remainder row.
Also wires product.unit_id through the API, which was previously not
settable at all, and corrects the misleading comment on the request's
unit_price field — that value has never been used; price always comes
from the database.
Design notes and the audit of every price multiplication site are in
docs/rfc-weight-based-products.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
efrilmandClaude Opus 5.5
ryan
aefril