EnakGame phase 10 of docs/tasks-enakgame.md (EG-1001 to EG-1003).
Spin (EG-1001)
- PROBABILITY entries take an optional label (a wheel segment). The customer game
list shows a PROBABILITY game's prizes (entry, label, amount, never weights), and
completing returns the drawn prize, so the client can draw the wheel and stop it
on the server's draw.
- docs/enakgame-spin.md: the admin steps to set up spin per organization (no
seeder) and the customer app flow. An HTTP test plays it end to end.
Old game flow removed (EG-1002)
- Routes POST /customer/spin, GET /customer/games, GET /customer/ferris-wheel, and
admin /marketing/games, /marketing/game-prizes, /marketing/rewards, with their
handlers, services, processors, repositories, validators, models, contracts,
mappers and tests (GamePlayProcessor, SpinGameService, rewards, ...). This also
closes RFC §15 findings 1 and 2 (double charge, spinning another org's game).
- Tables games, game_prizes, game_plays and rewards stay for ledger history.
entities.StringSlice moves to its own file; the omset tracker (unrouted) keeps
game_id but no longer embeds the old game response.
games.is_active dropped (EG-1003)
- Migration 000115; nothing reads metadata.coin_cost any more.
The EnakPoint integration docs now point at /customer/enakgame. The Postgres tests
were not run: no test database here. Migration 000115 has not been run anywhere.
The customer app must stop calling the removed endpoints before this is deployed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every lot now gets its expiry when it is created (docs/prd-point-coin.md
F12, PC-502), where it used to never expire until note N4 was settled:
- EARN and an ADJUSTMENT that adds: ComputeExpiry of the organization's
settings for that currency, from the moment received.
- EXCHANGE_IN: the sooner of the EnakCoin lot's expiry and when EnakPoint
received now expire (F4).
- PAYMENT_REFUND: the expiry of the lot the EnakPoint came from, but at
least seven days from the refund (N4, decided). A lot that never expired
stays so.
- TRANSFER_IN: unchanged, exactly the sender's expiry.
Turning expiry on for a currency for the first time dates every lot of the
organization that still holds something and has no expiry, MIGRATION lots
included, in the same transaction as the setting: a full period from now
when ROLLING, the second fixed date on or after today when FIXED_DATE, so
no customer loses a balance soon after the rule is announced (N4,
decided). Turning it off leaves dated lots as they are. PUT
/marketing/loyalty-settings reports these as expiry_activations (currency,
lots, amount, expires_at); a dry run counts them without dating anything.
The earning processor now also reads the organization settings, and the
wallet admin processor takes the settings reader.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds GET /marketing/wallet-transactions/:id/trace (docs/prd-point-coin.md
F7, §8.1, PC-404).
From any ledger row of the organization, the trace lists the lots a debit
took from, with how much it took from each, or the lots a credit created.
Each lot is followed back through origin_lot_id, across transfers,
exchanges and refunds, to the lot an EARN, ADJUSTMENT or MIGRATION first
created. Every step shows the lot and the row that created it, with the
real name of the customer it belongs to, so the example of §8 (A sends 120
to B, B pays 30) leads from B's payment to A's order #ORD-1.
Lots are loaded a generation at a time, and a chain stops at 100 steps or
at a lot it has already seen, which only bad data could cause. A row of
another organization answers 404.
The dashboard's wallet view now builds its lots with the same helper.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds LoyaltySettingsProcessor (docs/prd-point-coin.md F1, F2, F12, PC-109).
Reading returns typed settings for an outlet (earning per currency, paying
with EnakPoint) and for an organization (point value, exchange rate,
transfers, and the expiry settings awaiting note N4). A key that was never
set takes the PRD default. A stored value that is unusable, such as an
earn_per_amount of 0 that would divide by zero, also falls back to the
default and is logged, so a bad row never reaches a calculation.
Writing takes the whole settings struct, validates every rule in the PRD
before touching the database, and stores and records in
loyalty_setting_changes only the keys whose effective value changes: old
value (NULL while it was on its default), new value, and who changed it.
Clearing a limit deletes the stored value. Each save runs in one
transaction under an advisory lock per outlet or organization, so two saves
at once cannot both compute their change from the same old value. The
outlet must belong to the caller's organization.
Every key is described once (key, default, valid range, bound field), and
reading, validating and diffing all use that description.
GET /customer/wallet now reads the point value through this processor; the
minimal organization settings repository from PC-106 is removed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the dashboard side of a customer's wallet (docs/prd-point-coin.md F7,
PC-107), under /marketing for admins and managers:
- GET /marketing/customers/:id/wallet returns the customer, the ledger and
spendable balances, every lot that still holds something (flagged when
expired), and a page of history. Unlike the customer's own view, each row
carries the real names behind it: the transfer counterparty, the admin or
cashier, and the outlet, plus the reason and metadata.
- POST /marketing/customers/:id/wallet/adjust takes a signed amount and a
required reason. It writes an ADJUSTMENT pointing at the admin through the
wallet engine, refuses to take more than the customer can spend, and
accepts an optional idempotency key so a retried request adjusts once.
Reasons describing a cash-out are refused (K7).
The customer must belong to the caller's organization; otherwise both
endpoints answer 404. Positive adjustments create non-expiring lots until
the expiry model is decided (F12, note N4).
The mapping from ledger rows to what the apps show is now shared between the
customer and dashboard views.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
efrilmandClaude Opus 5.5