Adds paying with the EnakPoint method (docs/prd-point-coin.md F9, K7,
PC-305).
POST /payments with the EnakPoint method now takes points and the
customer's payment code and goes through PointPaymentProcessor instead of
the generic path, which would record a payment without taking any balance.
After checking the order, its customer (not walk-in, active), the outlet
(accepts EnakPoint, minimum) and the method, it redeems the code, then in
one transaction locks the order row and the wallet, recomputes the F9
limits from fresh data, inserts the payment with points_used and the frozen
point_value, writes the PAYMENT ledger row (key payment:{id}, the outlet,
the cashier) and updates the order. The limits are
min(balance, floor(min(remaining, total × max_payment_percent / 100 − paid
with EnakPoint) / point_value)) in cents, so EnakPoint never pays more than
what is left and gives no change.
Unlike the generic CreatePayment, which always marks the order paid, an
EnakPoint payment leaves it partial with the right remaining amount until
it is settled, so the rest can be paid in cash. Settling it triggers
earning, whose basis leaves out the EnakPoint part. Splitting with the
EnakPoint method is refused. Refusals answer 400. The payment response
carries points_used and point_value for the receipt.
GET /orders/:id/point-payment/preview returns eligibility, balance, point
value and the maximum for the use-maximum button.
The payment and order repositories write outside transactions, so this
path uses its own repository that joins it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds points_earned and coins_earned to the order response
(docs/prd-point-coin.md F3, PC-205). The POS prints the receipt from this
response, so the receipt gets them too.
The values are the sums of the order's EARN rows, read in one query for a
list of orders. They are filled for create, add items, update, detail and
list, and are 0 for an order that earned nothing. UpdateOrder earns before
building its response, so a payment completed there already shows the
earning. A failure to read them is logged and leaves them at 0 rather than
failing the order read. The self-order session listing reads orders
directly from the repository and still shows 0.
The two order hooks are merged into one OrderLoyalty interface (paid,
refunded, earned by orders) with a single SetLoyalty.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Products like fish are sold per weighing (4.2 ons, 5.6 ons), which the
order line could not represent: quantity is INTEGER and prices are always
computed as quantity * unit_price.
Model one weighing as one order line. quantity stays INTEGER and keeps
meaning "how many items"; the measured amount goes into a new nullable
order_items.weight, and the line is priced weight * unit_price. Two
weighings of the same product are two lines, never merged into one.
Keeping quantity integral avoids float comparisons in void, refund and
split bill, where accumulated rounding error would silently misbehave —
"1.4 + 1.4 + 1.4" is not 4.2 in float64, which would leave a fully paid
split-bill item marked unpaid.
BillableQuantity() is now the single place that decides between weight
and count; every price and cost calculation goes through it. Missing one
would bill a 4.2 ons fish as a single ons — wrong money, no error.
Two database constraints back the design: a weighed line always carries a
positive weight, and its quantity is pinned to 1. The latter also makes
void all-or-nothing for weighed lines, so the row-splitting branch can
never produce a zero-weight remainder row.
Also wires product.unit_id through the API, which was previously not
settable at all, and corrects the misleading comment on the request's
unit_price field — that value has never been used; price always comes
from the database.
Design notes and the audit of every price multiplication site are in
docs/rfc-weight-based-products.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
efrilmandClaude Opus 5.5
Aditya Siregar